The Albanese government is introducing a new skilled migration framework that includes distinct visa categories targeting low-paid care workers, high-earning professionals, and a core stream for in-demand skills. However, tradies such as bricklayers are notably absent from the fast-track options, prompting concerns within the industry. This controversial move has raised questions about protection for skilled labor and the broader implications for Australia's housing crisis.
The Albanese administration is currently working on a new three-tiered skilled migration framework designed to address various categories of workers. This system features specialized visa pathways for low-wage care professionals, high-salaried experts earning upwards of $135,000, and a core stream tailored for workers with earnings between $70,000 and $135,000, particularly in sectors experiencing a labor shortage.
However, the government has stirred controversy by excluding skilled trades such as plumbing and bricklaying from the expedited pathway meant for higher-earning professionals. Consequently, these skilled laborers will have to navigate the more challenging core stream aimed at those earning between $70,000 and $135,000.
Industry stakeholders expressed their concerns upon realizing that essential trades like bricklaying and plumbing were not assured inclusion in this core stream, which is anticipated to be the primary source of visa grants under this new setup.
Moreover, builders who earn over $135,000 will still find themselves outside the fast-tracked, premier category proposed by Labor, a notable concession made to appease trade unions.
The pattern exhibited by Labor is all too familiar. While affluent tradespeople remain shielded from foreign competition, less fortunate tradies are left vulnerable to the impacts of this competition.
It’s crucial to consider whether we should be permitting any form of immigration at all. By halting this influx, we might alleviate the pressing need for constructing low-quality housing. Thus, the housing crisis may not see any resolution.
Instead, a reduction in immigration could lead to a redistribution of labor resources towards sectors that add greater value, like manufacturing. This shift could potentially yield productivity improvements that translate into sustained real wage increases.
Regrettably, such logical proposals seem to be dismissed easily in the current climate.
Canberra’s focus appears to remain resolute on welcoming more people consistently, which raises concerns about the strain it could place on the continent.
Comments 0